Aerobic Leotard 90´s

'90s, STUPID! K

course, are the '90s, the Menem administration. Ricky Fort is the Menem. Susana, Mirtha, Tinelli, De Narvaez, Macri. They are all the Menem.

They appear together, hug, wink your eyes, and agree on what to say. Of course, going to the same programs, and always speak of the same: the bullshit, the relentless frivolity. Mind you, when you need to seriously discuss issues no doubt, reiterate like parrots here are hysterical fear, you can not go out that inflation eats us, we're isolated from the world, and of course, we are full poor (that sounds bad niggers, no Duran?)

And idiot that you think you care about the children of the disappeared! You worry about the bicentennial, for the coup in Honduras, so did Israel, regionalism, by Macri listeners, the media law in Greece! uffff, which plunger chabón ... Until when? How long will we be a country that slows man?!

Look ahead, look to the developed world! Alongside them we have to be, and not embrace with Chavez or Bolivia's bold that I do not remember the name. We must be free to travel, filled with shopping malls nationwide, bringing outside investment. That creates jobs. And what these, giving them the black twine to buy wine and all we have to feed vague. This well is falling apart. Or darling?

I do not know if I live che wrong, but here I see that we fight for bullshit, and the rest of the world shit we laugh. Moreover, if we're late, we are bent on persecuting the old fart of the dictatorship, we are cutting routes and we're talking mouth human rights ... whose human rights? if here were only respect for human rights offenders. I left you, you're a good chabon, kill running inside your house while your sister is raped, and you'll see that you are in jail for 20 years. These things only happen here, in a fourth country.

But good, to hell with irony, I feel it already is hitting me. I said, are the Menem. The Menem administration is not a particular political moment in history. No. It is much more than that. Is the exacerbation of the values \u200b\u200bof individualism, egoism, the opportunism, the yo yo and me and me and me! and nobody but me! I come to speak of the children of Noble, or all those things I mentioned above. You have to give ball to how they dress the guests of the Columbus, Rial Quilombo, the boyfriend of Susan, Mirtha or lunches. Politics? Oh yes, potholes, uncertainty, and inflation. That's what people really care. back to that.

Na Dobre I Na Złe Ogladaj

were in the countryside!
were by airlines! Of the retirements were
!
were for football!
were by the media!

VAN FOR SOUTH AMERICA NOW!

"What's next? "Does the world?

Is Implantation Bleeding Heavier If Twins

THE TUMOR WILL THE CHILDREN OF NOBLE

As we have seen, one of the topics listed as fashion offer television-information in some media, is the case of children (giving the benefit of the doubt) Ernestina Herrera de Noble. Consequently, operators of the establishment, seeking to install an argument in defense of the director of Clarin, which is strongly rooted in public opinion: Noble's children have the right to remain who believe they are.

This foundation is a mere wild common sense. It is well to speak, and think it looks quite noble (if yes, it's a double meaning), if one considers that the State to investigate is subduing the will of those who bear the brunt of the case: the children of Ernestina.

However, this truth functional operators announced from Clarin, lacks any kind of foothold and empirical support. Once again, we see as "common sense", always flawed and influenced by cultural patterns emanating from the media, not enough to give the specific case a rational solution. Henceforth, I will explain the reasons.

abusing the summary, let me stress that very roughly from the twelfth or thirteenth century in Europe appear modern states, with the establishment of the capitalist system. Consequently, in criminal matters, the sovereign is expropriating the conflicts between individuals who give to it the power to monopolize the use of punitive power in their role as "punitive" and "researcher." In such a way that the will to try and find a real criminal is solely in the hands of the state, who will use the means at its disposal to meet their allocation.
neuralgic
This idea of \u200b\u200bthe issue, it holds up today. While it has mutated the type of procedure which the sovereign used (inquisitorial, adversarial, mixed), the State remains the only legitimate criminal to find out the truth in all western law. Argentina, no exception.

So, today, crime in general-specific exceptions, are public action, which means basically, that to a complaint or to the act of committing a crime, the State, through its organs and officials should proceed to investigate to find a resolution to the criminal case. This, independently of the will of the victim. do not know if she has already become clear: not to intervene, the State would be an accomplice to a crime, a situation contrary to the idea of \u200b\u200brule of law.

Assume the simple case when one of us is stolen on the way public, and the fact is observed by a police officer. In this case, the police, we are not consult what interest we have that the Government should intervene in the event. Simply will proceed, regardless of our will. One, as a victim, has no more to work with Justice to every matter that it holds. If a property crime, one as victim, has no voice and vote for the purpose of promoting judicial investigation, imagine what that must occur before a crime of such gravity as to be imputed to Mrs. Noble ?

Finally, I swear I can go into too much more, do not think that the right to be a right identity very personal is outside the scope of the state. In the particular case, identity is a seriously flawed, and what is worse is that the service is the work of a public official. Therefore, not only the right to identity is not so because there is a defect originating in it, but also the state can not in any way complicit in a crime of which he authored by one of their agents. Here, a double public responsibility to resolve this case. After

, dear readers, we see how common sense can not occur in such cases, as it is to be an argument lacks historical justification, legal, and empirical. As seen, the interference of the state above the will of the victims, not a whim or a position K authoritarian government, but due to public behavior has become the twelfth century and which survives to this day in all criminal proceedings.

No more, thanks for reading.

Electric Box 2 Solution Level 41

this day is important. No demos around, let alone party or ideological positions, or who had more eggs to make the revolution. Day deserves respect. Mothers deserve respect. The grandmothers, parents, children, siblings, cousins, friends, etc., They all deserve respect. No way missing, the exiled, the survivors, the tortured, the combatants, the dead. Absolutely everyone deserves respect.

And we're so friendly, that the military judge in courts and tribunals. Provide you with a defense that offer witnesses tell their version, which are not subjected to physical punishment. We allow for due process that does not subdue to any constitutional guarantee. If the Constitution. The same constitution they violated, and mime republicanism today we know to us.

allowing you to hold an ideology that promotes from channels of information, and that the allegation exposed in total lightness.

also allow them to live, many of them are free and many others have profited from for so long. As if that were not enough, his friends and relatives know where they are. We are so democratic, that allow their children to , nor deny them the right to ignore those who are actually "know where they are staying parents (Father?), What they are charged, and can go visit often as they want. We allow them to organize, convene marches, and public positions. Shit! We're so good that even the left stand for election!

What's not allow ourselves to give up. It is forbidden to forget, give up. Y recordar no es conocer el feriado, repetir la fecha, o haber leído o visto alguna vez algo relacionado a la trágica dictadura. Recordar es mucho más que eso. Consiste en sentirlo, en repudiarlo, en marchar, en expresarlo. Tampoco alcanza con saber bien quienes fueron los militares, ni quienes somos nosotros mismos.

Resulta necesario entender que la cosa no empezó con los desaparecidos ni terminó cuando devolvieron las urnas al pueblo. Acá no hubo un genocidio político - social y nada más. Hubo un genocidio industrial y económico, del cual subsisten células activas que al día de hoy no hemos sabido eliminar. Las minorías elitistas que diseñaron, sostuvieron y avalaron el golpe de Estado, son the same as today struggling to restore order destituyente conservative in Argentina. Behind the military power behind the economic power and not vice versa. There are democracies more damaging than military rule.

Village A democracy can not be seen with these minorities that mutate according to the political situation at the time. Have been fraudulent, military, neo, and now disguised as Republicans. Today they wear the garb of democracy, and out to contrast it with an authoritarian model. Call "non-violence" and "memory" as opposed to requiring the military sectors. However, his speech is a mere regeneration of its ideological stance, that only search we strengthen the political scene through information channels operating in a functional to their interests. The

30 000 missing are a banner and memory, and an open wound that will be impossible to close. But we must be aware that we are no longer enough to remember, because the enemy has mutated, finding ways that lead to an immediate appropriation of our progress.

memory exercise is not just remind us, but also recognize them.

No more, thanks for reading.
Nacho / John Sunday.